Introduction
Grapes (Vitis
vinifera L.) have been cultivated since long for consumption as fresh, dried,
and also as wine. Presently, about 47.3% of grape production is used for wine
production, 35% is consumed as fresh fruit; while, 8% is used as dried fruit in
the world (OIV 2017). The grapes are
important source of antioxidants and biologically active dietary compounds. The
most important biochemically active component of grapes is resveratrol which
has certain health-promoting benefits (Shrikhande 2000; Yadav et al. 2009). Grapes are also a decent source of minerals such as cobalt
(Co), iron (Fe), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and phosphorus (P) as well as
vitamins like K, B1, B2, B6, and C (Anonymous 2018).
Grapes is an important fruit occupying an area of 7.5 million ha
with 75.8 million tones production across the world (FAO 2016). In Pakistan, the production of grapes has been observed
to be 0.065 million tonnes from an area of 0.0162 million ha with 3.98 t ha-1
average yield (FAO 2016).
Presently, only European table grapes are being cultivated at commercial scale throughout temperate
regions in the country including Gilgit-Baltistan, Balochistan and some area of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (GOB 2016; Khan et al. 2011). The cultivars found in the country include ‘Haita’,
‘Kishmishi’, ‘Shundokhani’, ‘Sahibi’,
‘Shekhali’, ‘King’s Early’, ‘Cardinal’, ‘Anab-e-Shahi’, ‘Black Prince’, ‘Gold’,
‘Dehkani’, ‘Shamas Guru’, ‘Thompson’, ‘Perlette’, ‘Red Globe’, ‘Cardinal’,
‘King’s Ruby’, ‘NARC Black’, ‘Crimson’, ‘Flame’, ‘Sultana’ and ‘Muscatil’
(Aujla et al. 2011; Khan et al. 2011; Anonymous 2017). Earlier,
the cultivation of grapes at commercial scale was restricted only to
Balochistan and some area of Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa because during summer season monsoon rains in Punjab result in attack of fungal diseases and rottening of berries.
Researchers have evaluated different indigenous and exotic germplasm to
identify early-season maturing grapes cultivars which could escape these rains
and mature before the onset of rainy season for commercial production in the
monsoon regions of central Punjab such as ‘King’s Ruby’, ‘NARC Black’ and
‘Perlette’ (Khan et al. 2011; PARC 2018).
Growth and development of grapevine and grape berries
quality are influenced by many internal and external factors such as cultivar,
exposure to sun light, temperature, humidity, soil, nutrition and hormonal
regulation (Conde et al. 2007). Both
macro and micro-nutrients affect the yield and quality related features of
grapes (Usha and Singh 2002). Various physiological functions such as
development of flower, berry, and seed, setting of fruit, length of cluster,
compactness of bunch, physical and chemical attributes of berry are regulated
by many internal plant growth substances. Such variables can also be regulated
by foliar application of plant growth regulators (PGRs), though, the effects
may contrast with the variation in concentration, application time, growth
stage and vine age (Farooq and Hulmani 2000; Korkutal et al. 2008; Shah et al.
2015).
Moringa oleifera known as ‘Drumstick Tree’ exhibits outstanding health
promoting benefits (Mishra et al. 2011) and rich
source of various phytochemicals (Leone et
al. 2015), plant growth regulator cytokinin (zeatin), macro and
micro-nutrients, phenolics, antioxidants, carotenoid, vitamins and ascorbates (Foidl
et al. 2001; Aslam et al. 2005; Yasmeen et al.
2014). It has been found that on dry weight basis its leaves contained 27.5 mg
kg-1 cytokinins, 15.9 mg kg-1 auxins, 16.8 mg kg-1 gibberellins
and 10.5 mg kg-1 abscisic acid (Abusuwar and Abohassan 2017). Due to
presence of the above-mentioned compounds, the foliar application of MLE has
been reported to promote growth and development of various agronomic and
horticultural crops (Foidl et al. 2001;
Nasir et al. 2016, 2018, 2020). Exogenous application of MLE significantly improved
growth, quality, and yield characters of plum (Thanaa et al. 2017), pear (El-Hamied and El-Amary 2015) and orange (El-Enien et al. 2015) fruit. Similarly, ‘Kinnow’ mandarin trees treated with 0.3% MLE in combination with, K and
Zn at fruit set stage showed significantly higher productivity and with better
fruit quality (Nasir et al. 2016,
2018, 2020).
Presently, the excessive and frequent use of chemical
inputs such as fertilizers and PGRs has increased the consumer awareness for
their hazardous effects (Helmy et al
2015). There is now a growing demand for availability of relatively
eco-friendly, affordable, easily accessible, and naturally available resources
for improving crop growth, productivity and quality (Rashid et al. 2018). To the best of our
knowledge, at present no information is available about the influence of
exogenous application of MLE on growth, productivity, and quality of grapes.
Therefore, present study investigated the effect of foliar application of MLE
at various phenological stages on grapevine growth, productivity, and berry
quality of five early-season maturing commercial table grapes cultivars grown
under the subtropical climatic conditions.
Materials and
Methods
Plant material
Four years
old, five commercial grapes (Vitis
vinifera L.) cultivars viz.
‘Cardinal’, ‘Flame Seedless’, ‘King’s Ruby’, ‘NARC Black’ and ‘Perlette’
propagated asexually (through cuttings) and grown in uniform condition at Rana
Abdul Qayyum’s Commercial Grape Vineyard, 41 R.B., Rohrhi-Wala
(31°38'59.8"N; 73°25'28.4"E), Tehsil Sangla, District Nankana Sahib, located about 55 km east to Faisalabad were selected for this
experiment. These vines trained on permanent support as Four Arm Kniffin System
(with 3.4 m × 3.4 m row and 2.1 × 2.1 m plant distance) were treated with
uniform standard commercial cultural practices such as pruning, fertilizer
application, irrigation, weeding, insect-pest and disease management.
Experimental treatments
For MLE, the fresh
leaves after harvest were kept overnight at -20°C before grinding for their
leaf extract (Nasir et al. 2016). MLE solution (3%) was prepared by
mixing 300 mL of MLE with 10 L of distilled water. Foliar spray of 3% MLE was applied
to all grape cultivars at three phonological growth stages (i.e., at
bloom, berry set and premature stages) using hand sprayer thoroughly
until drops run-off from the leaves. The experiment was designed as two factors (treatments and cultivars) factorial
arrangements under RCBD. Single vine was used as experimental unit, replicated
thrice.
Determination of leaf nutrients
At harvest 40–50
healthy uniform leaves (along with petiole) apparently free from any symptoms
of disease or insect pest were harvest from each experimental unit at random to
determine the leaf nutrient status. After proper washing and drying, grinded
leaf powder was used for further analysis. Leaf nitrogen (N)
was estimated on micro kjeledhal apparatus, P on spectrophotometer and K on
flame photometer prescribed by Chapman and Parker (1961) as per cent dry
weight. Whereas, leaf Fe, manganese (Mn) and zinc (Zn) were estimated by
following the protocol described in AOAC (2000) on atomic absorption
spectrophotometer. Before the determination of leaf P, K, Fe, Mn and Zn wet
digestion were done following the detailed procedure used earlier by Khan et al. (2015) and expressed as mg kg-1 DW.
Vegetative and reproductive growth
For the study
of growth behavior, five uniform and health canes per experimental vine were
selected and tagged. Data regarding cane length (cm), leaf size (cm2),
No. of leaves per cane, berry set percentage (%), berry drop percentage (%),
total no. of berries per cluster, rachis length (cm), cluster weight (g),
cluster size (cm2), berry weight (g), berry size (mm2),
total clusters per vine (No.), yield per vine (kg), yield per acre (kg) were
recorded by using the method described by Khan et al. (2012).
Berry quality parameters
For chemical
analysis of fresh grapes berry (randomly selected 250 berries per experimental
unit), juice was extracted manually by using muslin cloth. Berry juice pH was
taken by digital pH meter (HI 98107, Hanna Instruments, Mauritius). A digital refractometer (RX-5000 Atago, Japan) was used for determining TSS as expressed in ºBrix.
Method described by Khan et al.
(2011) was used to estimate the titratable acidity (%) and different forms of
sugars (total, reducing and non-reducing sugars) in grape berry juice.
Calculation of TSS:TA ratio was done by dividing TSS
with the TA percentage. Ascorbic acid contents (Vitamin C) in grape berry juice
was estimated by adopting the process described by Khan et al. (2011) and were expressed as mg 100 g-1 FW. Assay reported by Brand-Williams et
al. (1995) was used to estimate the total antioxidants in grapes berry
juice by 2, 2-diphenyl-1picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) assay and were expressed
as % inhibition. Total phenolics contents (TPC) in grapes juice were estimated
using the Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) technique defined by Ainsworth and Gillespie
(2007) and were expressed as mg GAE 100 g-1 FW.
Statistical analysis
Data were evaluated statistically by using software Statistix 8.1 and
Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was applied to differentiate means by
using the differences among different means at P ≤ 0.05.
Fig. 1: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on leaf K (a), Fe (b) and Zn (c) contents
of grapes cultivars. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of means. n = 3 replicates
Results
Leaf
mineral contents
Foliar application of MLE to the grapevine cultivars did
not show significant effect on leaf N, P and Mn contents (Table 1). However,
these mineral concentrations were higher in MLE-treated vine as compared to
leaves of untreated vines. This impact
of MLE on leaf N, P and Mn may be ascribed to very lower concentration present
in the MLE which remain unaffected to improve their endogenous level. Exogenously
applied MLE (3%) significantly increased leaf K, Fe and Zn contents as compared
to untreated control. Application of MLE showed highest leaf K (1.36%) and Fe
(136 mg kg-1) contents in leaves of grapes cv. ‘NARC Back’ compared
to untreated control (Fig. 1a–b); while, maximum increase in Zn levels (from
30.7 to 43 mg kg-1) in leaves of ‘Perlette’ (Fig. 1c).
Vegetative and reproductive growth
The number of
leaves per cane was not significantly affected by application of MLE (3%) on
grapes cultivars. The
exogenous spray of MLE (3%) on grapevines at various growth phases (at bloom + fruit
set + premature stages) significantly improved leaf size of all
cultivars. Highest leaf size was observed in ‘NARC Black’ (112.3 cm2
vs. 79.7 cm2 of untreated)
and least increase in ‘Flame’ (176.9 cm2 vs. 170.5 cm2) of untreated, respectively (Table 1). Likewise,
after foliar applied MLE (3%), grapevines
exhibited positive significant impact on the cane length
and rachis length (Table 2). Highest increase of cane length with
application of MLE treatment was found in grapes cv. ‘Perlette’ (25.6%)
followed by ‘NARC Black’ (19.2%), ‘Flame’ (18.2%), ‘Cardinal’ (7.9%) and
‘King’s Ruby’ (6.8%).
The grapes
reproductive characters varied with the cultivar but application of moringa
exogenously on grapevines showed promising improvement in reproductive
characters such as rachis length, reduced berry drop and increased berry set,
berries per cluster, berry size, berry weight, cluster size, cluster weight and
ultimately yield of all the studied cultivars. Exogenously applied 3% MLE
significantly improved the rachis length of grapevine cultivars (Table 2). The
highest increase in rachis length was observed in ‘King's Ruby’ (28.1%) and
lowest in ‘Flame Seedless’ (5.1%) as compared to untreated vines. Berry set on
the clusters of grapes was significantly enhanced by MLE (3%). Maximum increase
of berry set percentage was found in ‘Cardinal’
(39.2% compared to 30.7%) and followed by ‘NARC Black’ (50.5% compared to 41.9)
and ‘Perlette’ (51.8% compared to 45.8%) (Fig. 2a). On
the other hand, MLE (3%) treatment at three growth phases significantly reduced
the berry drop from the clusters of grapes as compared to untreated vines.
‘Cardinal’ revealed up to (24.9%) less berry drop than the vines without
treatment followed by ‘Perlette’ (24.3%), ‘NARC Black’ (16.9%), ‘King's Ruby’
(6.5%) and ‘Flame Seedless’ (1.9%) (Fig. 2b).
Table 1: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on leaf N, P, Mn contents, no. of leaves and leaf size of grapes
cultivars
Cultivars |
Leaf N (%) |
Leaf P (%) |
Leaf Mn (mg kg-1) |
Leaves per cane (No.) |
Leaf size (cm2) |
||||||
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
||
‘Cardinal’ |
2.68 |
2.80 |
0.34 |
0.36 |
180.00 |
188.00 |
43.76 |
47.60 |
140.01 |
175.71 |
|
‘Flame Seedless’ |
2.68 |
3.03 |
0.35 |
0.37 |
187.33 |
196.33 |
102.77 |
106.52 |
170.49 |
176.88 |
|
‘King's Ruby’ |
2.68 |
2.68 |
0.36 |
0.37 |
200.67 |
208.33 |
109.31 |
116.82 |
183.21 |
190.19 |
|
‘NARC Black’ |
2.80 |
2.92 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
190.33 |
196.00 |
67.73 |
69.80 |
79.66 |
112.31 |
|
‘Perlette’ |
2.45 |
2.57 |
0.36 |
0.37 |
204.67 |
209.33 |
76.00 |
84.40 |
181.80 |
216.30 |
|
LSD (P
≤ 0.05) |
|||||||||||
Treatments |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
13.100 |
||||||
Cultivars |
NS |
NS |
12.095 |
11.714 |
20.713 |
||||||
Treatments x cultivars |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
||||||
n = 3 replicates, NS =
non-significant
Table 2: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on cane length,
rachis length and berry components of grapes cultivars
Cultivars |
Cane length (cm) |
Rachis length (cm) |
Berries per cluster (No.) |
Berry size (mm2) |
Berry weight (g) |
||||||
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
No spray |
MLE spray |
||
‘Cardinal’ |
87.27 |
94.13 |
18.60 |
21.70 |
181.95 |
240.20 |
247.55 |
318.25 |
3.69 |
3.92 |
|
‘Flame Seedless’ |
106.11 |
125.41 |
18.08 |
19.00 |
281.66 |
293.22 |
236.31 |
246.01 |
2.07 |
2.21 |
|
‘King's Ruby’ |
90.75 |
96.94 |
18.81 |
24.10 |
339.35 |
363.11 |
255.70 |
290.51 |
2.27 |
2.42 |
|
‘NARC Black’ |
112.20 |
133.77 |
14.00 |
17.57 |
94.07 |
112.60 |
256.55 |
309.58 |
2.45 |
2.88 |
|
‘Perlette’ |
108.53 |
136.27 |
21.20 |
25.73 |
423.27 |
514.33 |
200.22 |
223.54 |
1.59 |
1.95 |
|
LSD (P ≤ 0.05) |
|||||||||||
Treatments |
7.3807 |
1.5301 |
22.527 |
11.800 |
0.1680 |
||||||
Cultivars |
11.670 |
2.4193 |
35.618 |
18.657 |
0.2656 |
||||||
Treatments x
cultivars |
NS |
NS |
NS |
26.385 |
NS |
||||||
n = 3 replicates, NS =
non-significant
There was
highly significant variation in number of berries per cluster, berry size and
berry weight among the cultivars (Table 2). As well as, exogenous applied MLE
significantly improved berry characters as compared to control without any
treatment. The berries per cluster increased from (4.1%) to (32%) in ‘Flame
Seedless’ and ‘Cardinal’, respectively. Whereas, ‘Perlette’, ‘NARC Black’ and
‘King’s Ruby’ had shown an increase of berries per cluster (21.5%), (19.7%) and
(7%), respectively as compared to untreated vines. As MLE spray increased berry
set and reduced berry drop percentage, it ultimately led to an increase in the
number of berries which reached to harvest maturity and thereby increased
yield. In response to MLE ‘Cardinal’ showed highest (28.6%) increase in berry
size (318.3 mm2 compared to 247.6 mm2 of untreated vines)
(Table 2). ‘Perlette’ had highest and ‘Cardinal’ had lowest significant
increase in berry weight upon exogenous application of MLE (3%) as compared to
its corresponding untreated vines.
Fig. 2: Impact of foliar application of MLE (3%) on berry set (a) and berry drop (b) percentage of grapes cultivars. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of
means. n = 3 replicates
Exogenous application of MLE did not show any
significant effect on number of clusters per vine (Table 3). However, MLE
applied at flowering, berry setting and premature stages significantly improved
cluster size, cluster weight and ultimately yield. Amon cultivars, minimum
increase of cluster size was evident in ‘King's Ruby’ (7.15%) followed ‘Flame
Seedless’ (7.4%) and maximum increase was in ‘Cardinal’, ‘NARC Black’ and ‘Perlette’ (27.4, 24.3 and 22.3%, respectively). Maximum
increase in cluster weight was observed in cv. ‘Cardinal’ followed by
‘Perlette’, ‘NARC Black’, ‘Flame Seedless’ and ‘King's Ruby’ cvs., as compared
to untreated vines. MLE (3%) had also a remarkable significant impact on the
yield of grapes per vine. The highest increase of yield per vine was observed
in ‘Perlette’ (32.1%) followed by ‘NARC Black’ (30.3%), ‘Cardinal’ (28.8%),
‘Flame Seedless’ (27.3%) and ‘King's Ruby’ (11.9%) as compared to their
corresponding untreated vines (Table 3).
Berry
quality
Foliar application of MLE 3% solution did not show any
significant impact on the colour and flavor berries. However, berry texture,
taste and overall acceptability exhibited significant improvement with MLE
application in all cvs. (Table 4). Exogenous application of MLE significantly improved TSS
and TSS:TA ration and reduced TA of all the grapevines
cvs. Highest TSS (10.9%) was observed in ‘NARC Black’ and lowest value of TSS
was recoded in ‘Flame Seedless’ (4.6%) compared their respective berries
harvested from untreated vines (Fig. 3b). Similarly, MLE application
significantly improved the TSS: TA ratio of berries harvested form treated than
untreated vines (Fig. 3c). However, MLE effectively reduced the acidity in
grapes at harvest. The ‘Perlette’ showed (21.7%) less TA than the untreated
control vines followed by ‘King's Ruby’ (19.51%), ‘NARC Black’ (15.2%), ‘Flame
Seedless’ (11.2%) and ‘Cardinal’ (8.6%) cvs. (Fig. 3a).
Foliar
application of MLE showed significantly improved total, reducing and
non-reducing sugar percentage of grape berry juice. These sugars also varied
significantly among cultivars. ‘NARC Black’ had highest (20.1%) and ‘Flame
Seedless’ (14.8%) had lowest significant increase in total sugar contents in
grape juice upon exogenous application of 3% MLE (Fig. 4a). However, foliar
application of MLE showed non-significant results with respect to pH and total
antioxidant contents of grapes berry juice (Table 5). Though, pH and total
antioxidant contents of grape berry juice somewhat varied among the cultivars.
‘NARC Black’ had shown the highest (53.4%) inhibition and ‘Perlette’ (41.7%)
inhibition of total antioxidant contents in juice of berries collected from
untreated grapevines. On an average, irrespective of cvs.
application of MLE improved the level of total
antioxidants of grapes berries in contrast to untreated control.
Fig. 3: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on TA (a), TSS (b) and TSS:TA ratio (c) of berry juice of grapes cultivars. Vertical bars indicate ± SE
of means. n = 3 replicates
Fig. 4: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on total (a), reducing (b) and non-reducing (c) sugar percentages of berry juice of
grapes cultivars. Vertical bars indicate ±SE of means. n=3 replicates
Exogenously
applied MLE significantly improved berry juice Vitamin C and total phenolic
contents (TPC). Highest increase in Vitamin C contents was recorded in cv.
‘Cardinal’ (12.82 mg 100 mL-1) compared to
untreated vines (10.1 mg 100 mL-1) which was about 27.3% increase
followed by ‘Perlette’ were (10.9 9.2 mg 100 mL-1 compared to 9.2 mg
100 mL-1 of untreated vines) which was (20%) increase; whereas,
least 8.3% increase in Vitamin C contents was observed in cv. ‘King’s Ruby’
(Fig. 5a). Irrespective of cvs., grapes harvested from
MLE sprayed vines exhibited 1.1-fold to 1.3-fold higher TPC, as compared to
untreated control. Among grapes cvs., cv. ‘NARC Black’ treated with MLE showed highest (302 mg
GAE 100 g-1) about 1.3-fold increase in the TPC as compared to
control (Fig. 5b).
Table 4: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on organoleptic characters of different
grape cultivars
Cultivars |
Colour (score) |
Texture (score) |
Taste (score) |
Flavour (score) |
Overall acceptability (score) |
||||||
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
||
‘Cardinal’ |
6.53 |
6.67 |
5.80 |
6.53 |
6.00 |
6.60 |
5.87 |
6.20 |
6.47 |
7.07 |
|
‘Flame Seedless’ |
5.27 |
5.60 |
5.07 |
5.20 |
5.13 |
5.53 |
5.07 |
5.40 |
5.67 |
6.13 |
|
‘King's Ruby’ |
5.73 |
5.93 |
5.07 |
5.73 |
5.20 |
5.53 |
5.87 |
6.00 |
5.60 |
6.10 |
|
‘NARC Black’ |
6.13 |
6.33 |
6.40 |
7.53 |
6.13 |
7.40 |
6.13 |
6.13 |
6.80 |
7.60 |
|
‘Perlette’ |
6.87 |
7.13 |
5.93 |
6.93 |
6.13 |
7.20 |
5.67 |
6.00 |
6.60 |
7.27 |
|
LSD (P ≤ 0.05) |
|||||||||||
Treatments |
NS |
0.4089 |
0.2948 |
NS |
0.2211 |
||||||
Cultivars |
0.3819 |
0.6466 |
0.4662 |
0.5447 |
0.3496 |
||||||
Treatments x
Cultivars |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
||||||
n = 3 replicates, NS =
non-significant
Table 5: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on pH and total
antioxidant contents of berry juice of different grape cultivars
Cultivars |
pH |
Total antioxidant (% inhibition) |
|||
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
No Spray |
MLE (3%) |
||
‘Cardinal’ |
3.05 |
3.18 |
43.56 |
49.49 |
|
‘Flame Seedless’ |
2.91 |
3.04 |
52.73 |
54.18 |
|
‘King's Ruby’ |
3.03 |
3.07 |
49.66 |
51.04 |
|
‘NARC Black’ |
3.24 |
3.32 |
53.39 |
55.01 |
|
‘Perlette’ |
2.81 |
2.90 |
41.73 |
45.86 |
|
LSD (P ≤ 0.05) |
|
|
|||
Treatments |
NS |
NS |
|||
Cultivars |
0.2169 |
6.88 |
|||
Treatments ×
Cultivars |
NS |
NS |
|||
n = 3 replicates, NS =
non-significant
Fig. 5: Effect of foliar application of MLE (3%) on ascorbic
acid (a) and total phenolic (b) contents of berry juice of grapes
cultivars. Vertical bars indicate ± SE of means. n = 3 replicates
Discussion
In current study, vines sprayed with MLE showed higher
levels of macro and micronutrients as compared to control. Moringa is found to
be rich in minerals including K, Fe and Zn (Nasir et al. 2016).
These might be used as an important mineral supplement as an alternate to
chemical forms of these elements for crop improvement (Aslam et al. 2005). The
accumulation of mineral nutrients including K and Fe in rocket plants was
significantly higher in the plants treated with aqueous extracts of both leaf
and twig extracts of moringa (Abdalla 2013). Similarly, MLE increased leaf K
percentage contents of ‘Navel’ orange trees (El-Enien et al. 2015). Earlier exogenous application of seaweed extract
was found to enhance the leaf Zn content of the grapes (Sabir et al. 2014).
Likewise, MLE treated vines exhibited expanded leaf size in all cultivars in
contrast with non-treated vines (Table 1). Similarly, it has been reported reported that seed soaking in MLE + foliar spray of MLE
on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris
L.) cv. Bronco significantly improved their leaf area (Rady and Mohamed 2015). The improvement in cane length and rachis length of grape
cultivars under study which might be due to the availability of plant growth
hormones (such as zeatin) and mineral elements found abundantly in moringa
leaves, which play important role in cell division and cell elongation that
lead to promote the growth of plants and can be used in agriculture industry
(Ashfaq et al. 2012). Phaseolus
vulgaris L. plants treated as seed soaking by salicylic acid + foliar spray
with MLE were found to significantly increase shoot length (Rady and Mohamed
2015).
Reproductive
growth showed significant improvement in MLE treated vines (Table 2–3). This
increase can be ascribed to the improved hormonal and mineral nutrient status
of treated plants (Ashfaq et al.
2012). Earlier, grapevines sprayed with Ascophyllum nodosum marine-plant
extract and PGR (brassinosteroids) significantly improved their rachis length
(Norrie and Keathley 2006). Such increase in fruit set may be owed to the
balanced nutritional properties whereas, berry drop
may be due to the imbalance of nutrients in the grapevine. As MLE is found to
rich source of important macro and micro elements, growth stimulators, amino
acids, carbohydrates and proteins, its foliar application might have elevated
the nutritional properties of grape and consequently increased berry set and
reduced berry drop. In agreement to this, in a study the application of growth
promoting compounds on grapes has improved fruit set, reduced premature berry
drop and improved bunch parameters (Farooq and Hulmani 2000). As M. oleifera
leaves are high in zeatin (cytokinin) (Ashfaq et al. 2012) the effect of MLE supports the fact that fruit size
increases with cell division and cell enlargement and may be attributed to that
cytokinins (Santner et al. 2009).
Likewise, moringa extract treatment has significantly increased fresh fruit
weight ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (Nasir et al.
2016) and plum (Thanaa et al. 2017).
The PGRs can be used to increase yield per unit area of
a plant because they are responsible for changing the patterns of growth and
development as in present study (Table 3). MLE has been found to contain
considerable amounts of indole-3-acetic acid, gibberellins, zeatin (natural
cytokinin) and abscisic acid (Rady and Mohamed 2015). These growth hormones
influence yield remarkably. Similarly, MLE has been reported to have increased
the yield of crops like onion, tomato, peanut, sugar cane and corn (Foidl et al. 2001),
navel orange (El-Enien et al. 2015),
pear (El-Hamied and El-Amary 2015) and plum (Thanaa et al. 2017). Plant growth regulators are found to be effective in
improving grape quality and thereby making it acceptable for the consumers. MLE
having plant growth promoting properties had also improved the grape
qualitative characters. Similarly, grapevine treatment with IAA, GA3
and zeatins improved the quality variables of 'Superior Seedless' table grapes
(Jalil et al. 2017). ABA enhanced cluster attractiveness, colour and
visual liking of grapes (Reynolds et al. 2016).
Moringa is
wonder plant with unique nutritional profile significantly affect biochemical
quality of fruits and vegetables. Vines sprayed with MLE showed higher
concentration of biochemical quality attributes as compared to control (Fig.
2). Application of PGRs and nutrient elements improve the TSS percentage in the
plants. MLE applied on orange trees had significantly increased juice TSS (El-Enien et al. 2015). Accumulation of sugar and
acidity levels is inversely proportional to each other. As MLE increased the
TSS and sugar contents in grape berry juice it correspondingly reduced the TA
percentage. Accordingly, foliar spray of MLE on the ‘Hollywood’ plum trees
significantly reduced the TA as compared to untreated trees (Thanaa et al. 2017).
In coincidence to our results regarding
sugars (Fig. 4), MLE had significant positive influence on the total sugar
contents of ‘Le-Conte’ pear (El-Hamied and El-Amary 2015). The reducing sugar
contents of the berries harvested from the vines treated with MLE were more
than control (Fig. 4b). The highest and lowest percent increase in the reducing
sugar contents of berry juice were in the ‘NARC Black’ had (19.30%) and
‘Cardinal’ (10.15%), respectively in comparison with their untreated ones. MLE
(3%) had a significant positive impact on non-reducing percentage of grape
juice of all the cultivars (Fig. 4c).
MLE
application significantly improved ascorbic acid and phenolic contents of table
grapes (Fig. 5a–b). Accordingly, when common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)
plants, pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants and plum trees were treated
with MLE, it resulted in significantly higher vitamin C contents (Thanaa et al. 2017). Phenolic compounds play an
important role in grape organoleptic properties. MLE when applied in combination with, K and Zn applied on
‘Kinnow’ mandarin resulted in significantly higher total phenolic contents
(Nasir et al. 2016). Foliar spray of
MLE significantly increased TPC of spinach leaves (Aslam et al. 2016).
Conclusion
Grapes cvs. ‘Perlette’, ‘NARC Black’ and
‘Cardinal’ showed best response to MLE sprays as compared to ‘King’s Ruby’ and
‘Flame Seedless’. Thus, exogenous application of MLE can be efficiently applied
on grapevines at flowering, berry setting and premature growth phases to
improve its vegetative, reproductive growth as well as physico-chemical quality
features.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Rana Abdul Qayyum, the owner of Commercial
Grape Vineyard, 41 R.B., Rohrhi-Wala for providing grapevines to conduct this
research trial.
Author Contributions
A.S. Khan and S.M.A. Basra conceived the idea and planned the
study. M. Ibrahim conducted the research trial. All authors equally contributed
in providing critical feedback for analysis, editing, commenting, revising and
approving the manuscript without conflict of interest.
References
Abdalla MM (2013).
The potential of Moringa oleifera
extract as a biostimulant in enhancing the growth, biochemical and hormonal
contents in rocket (Eruca vesicaria subspp.
sativa) plants. Intl J Plant Physiol Biochem 5:42‒49
Abusuwar AO, RA
Abohassan (2017). Effect of Moringa olifera leaf extract on growth and productivity of three
cereal forages. J Agric Sci
9:236‒243
Ainsworth EA, KM
Gillespie (2007). Estimation of total phenolic content and
other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin-Ciocalteu
reagent. Nat Protoc 2:875‒877
Anonymous
(2018). Grapes
Nutritional Profile. Available at: http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=foodspice&dbid=40#nutritionalprofile
(Accessed: 10 March 2018)
Anonymous
(2017). Agribusiness
Grape Farming: Production of grapes in Pakistan. Available at: http://www.agribusiness.com.pk/production-of-grapes-in-pakistan/
(Accessed: 08 March 2018)
AOAC
(2000). Official Methods
of Analysis of the Association of the Analytical Chemists, 17th edn. AOAC International, Washington DC, USA
Ashfaq M, SMA Basra, U
Ashfaq (2012). Moringa: A miracle plant of agro-forestry. J Agric Soc Sci 8:115‒122
Aslam M, B Sultana, F
Anwar, H Munir (2016). Foliar spray of selected plant growth regulators
affected the biochemical and antioxidant attributes of spinach in a field
experiment. Turk J Agric For 40:136‒145
Aslam M, F Anwar, R
Nadeem, U Rashid, TG Kazi, M Nadeem (2005). Mineral composition of Moringa oleifera leaves and pods from
different regions of Punjab, Pakistan. Asian
J Plant Sci 4:417‒421
Aujla KM, NA Shah, M
Ishaq, A Fraooq (2011). Postharvest losses and marketing of
grapes in Pakistan. Sarhad J Agric 27:485‒490
Brand-Williams W, ME
Cuvelier, CLWT Berset (1995). Use of a free radical method to
evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food
Sci Technol 28:25‒30
Chapman HD, F Parker
(1961). Determination
of NPK. In: Method of Analysis for
Soil, Plant and Waters, pp:150‒179. Agric. Div., Univ. California,
Riverside, USA
Conde C, P Silva, N
Fontes, ACP Dias, RM Tavares, MJ Sousa, A Agasse, S Delrot, H Gerós (2007).
Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine
quality. Food 1:1‒22
El-Enien MA, AM El-Azazy, FS El-Sayed (2015). Effect of moringa
leaves extract as a natural product compared with other synthetic compounds on
yield production and fruit quality of navel orange trees. Egypt J Hortic 42:899‒911
El-Hamied
SAA, EI El-Amary (2015). Improving growth and productivity
of “pear” trees using some natural plants extracts under North Sinai
conditions. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 8:1‒9
FAO
(2016). FAO-OIV Focus 2016: Table and dried grapes. Available at: www.fao.org/3/a-i7042e.pdf
(Accessed: 07 March 2018)
Farooq M, NC Hulmani
(2000). Effect of growth regulators and boric acid and their
stage of treatment on bunch characters of ‘Arkavati’ grapes. Karnat J Agric Sci 13:1049‒1053
Foidl N, HPS Makkar, K
Becker (2001). The Potential of Moringa oleifera for agricultural and industrial uses. In: The Miracle Tree: The Multiple
Attributes of Moringa, pp:45‒76.
Fuglie LJ (Ed.). CTA, Wageningen, Netherlands
GOB
(2016). Agriculture; Development Statistics of Balochistan 2015-2016. Government of Balochistan. Available at: http://balochistan.gov.pk/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=1686&Itemid=677
(Accessed: 09 March 2018)
Helmy
G, S Ahmed, S Mahrous (2015). Evaluation of synthetic plant growth
regulators residues in fruits and vegetables and health risk assessment in
Giza, Egypt. J Soil Sci Agric Engr Mansoura Univ 6:1075‒1089
Jalil MAM, JPM
Maratta, MB Pugliese (2017). Effect of spray combinations of
IAA, GA3 and zeatin on berry growth and quality in 'Superior
Seedless'. Acta Hortic 1157:125‒130
Khan AS, M Nasir, AU
Malik, SMA Basra, MJ Jaskani (2015). Combined application of boron and
zinc influence the leaf mineral status, growth, productivity and fruit quality
of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (Citrus nobilis
Lour × Citrus deliciosa Tenora).
J Plant Nutr 38:821‒838
Khan AS, B Ahmad, MJ
Jaskani, R Ahmad, AU Malik (2012). Foliar application of mixture of amino acids and
seaweed (Ascophylum nodosum) extract improve growth and physico-chemical
properties of grapes. Intl
J Agric Biol 14:383‒388
Khan AS, N Ahmad, AU
Malik, BA Saleem, IA Rajwana (2011). Pheno-physiological
revelation of grapes germplasm grown in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Intl J Agric Biol 13:791‒795
Korkutal
L, E Bahar, O Gokhan (2008). The
characteristics of substances regulating growth and development of plants and
the utilization of gibrellic acid in viticulture. World J Agric Sci 4:321‒325
Leone
A, A Spada, A Battezzati, A Schiraldi, J Aristil, S
Bertoli (2015). Cultivation, genetic, ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry
and pharmacology of Moringa oleifera
leaves: An overview. Intl J Mol Sci
16:12791‒12835
Mishra
G, P Singh, R Verma, S Kumar, S, Srivastav, KK Jha, RL Khosa (2011).
Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Moringa oleifera plant: An overview. Der Pharm Lett 3:141‒164
Nasir M, AS Khan, SMA Basra, AU Malik (2020). Improvement in
growth, productivity and quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin fruit after exogenous
application of Moringa oleifera leaf
extract. South Afr J Bot 129:263-271
Nasir M, AS Khan, SMA
Basra, STA Haider, S Riaz, N Mahreen (2018). Integrative application of biostimulants and nutrients
improves vegetative growth of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin. Intl J Agric Biol 20:2797‒2804
Nasir
M, AS Khan, SMA Basra AU Malik (2016). Foliar application of moringa leaf extract, potassium and zinc
influence yield and fruit quality of ‘Kinnow’mandarin. Sci Hortic 210:227‒235
Norrie J, JP Keathley
(2006). Benefits of Ascophyllum nodosum marine-plant extract
applications to ‘Thompson seedless’ grape production. Acta Hortic 727:243‒248
OIV
(2017). International
Organisation of Vine and Wine 2017: World Vitiviniculture Situation. Statistical Report on World Viti viniculture. Available at: http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/5479/oiv-en-bilan-2017.pdf (Accessed:
07 March 2019)
PARC
(2018). Early Grapes: A High Value Crop for Resource-Poor Farmers. Pakistan Agricultural Research Council. Available at: http://www.parc.gov.pk/files/Success-Stories/Enhancing%20Productivity%20of%20Horticultural%20Crops/01.pdf
(Acessed: 09 March 2019)
Rady MM, GF Mohamed
(2015). Modulation of salt stress effects on the growth,
physio-chemical attributes and yields of Phaseolus
vulgaris L. plants by the combined application of salicylic acid and Moringa oleifera leaf extract. Sci Hortic 193:105‒113
Rashid
N, SMA Basra, M Shahbaz, S Iqbal, MB Hafeez (2018).
Foliar applied moringa leaf extract induces terminal heat tolerance in quinoa. Intl J Agric Biol 20:157‒164
Reynolds
A, N Robbins, HS Lee, E Kotsaki (2016). Impacts and
interactions of abscisic acid and gibberellic acid on Sovereign Coronation and
Skookum Seedless table grapes. Amer J
Enol Viticult 67:327‒338
Sabir A,
K Yazar, F Sabir, Z Kara, MA Yazici, N Goksu (2014).
Vine growth, yield, berry quality attributes and leaf nutrient content of grapevines
as influenced by seaweed extract (Ascophyllum
nodosum) and nano size fertilizer pulverizations. Sci Hortic 175:1‒8
Santner A, LIA Calderon-Villalobos, M Estelle (2009). Plant hormones are versatile
chemical regulators of plant growth. Nat
Chem Biol 5:301‒307
Shah SS, A Khan, MA
Khan, K Farooq, M Riaz, M Chattha, ZA Gurmani, A
Hussain, M Iftikhar (2015). Effects of gibberellic acid on growth, yield and quality of grape cv.
Perlette. Intl J Biol Biotechnol 12:499‒503
Shrikhande AJ (2000). Wine by-products
with health benefits. Food
Res Intl 33:469‒474
Thanaa SM, NE Kassim,
MS Abou-Rayya, AM Abdalla (2017). Influence of foliar application with moringa
(Moringa oleifera L.) leaf extract on
yield and fruit quality of Hollywood plum cultivar. J Hortic 4:1‒7
Usha K, B Singh
(2002). Effect of macro and micro-nutrient spray on fruit
yield and quality of grape (Vitis
vinifera L.) cv. Perlette. Acta
Hortic 594:197‒202
Yadav M, S Jain, A Bhardwaj, R Nagpal, M Puniya, R Tomar (2009). Biological and medicinal properties of grapes and their bioactive
constituents. J Med Food
12:473‒484
Yasmeen A,
W Nouman, SMA Basra, A Wahid, Hafeez-ur-Rehman, N
Hussain, I Afzal (2014). Morphological and physiological response of
tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to
natural and synthetic cytokinin sources, a comparative study. Acta Physiol Plantarum 36:3147‒3155